Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 22:53
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 920
84% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,338
83% 1,338 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 118
Parallax 98.2
83% 106 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 104
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 680 689 810 751 821 744 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 782
Write 710
Mixed 613
SusWrite 749
161% 713 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 54.8
198% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 252
227% 344 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 155%
Great: 153%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
38GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 58 58 60 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 35.3
Write 53.3
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 58.6
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
114GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 78
Write 77.7
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 88.3
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
122GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 64 66 64 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 86.8
Write 85
Mixed 5
SusWrite 63.5
43% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
135GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 96.2
Write 128
Mixed 64
SusWrite 117
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 75%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
945GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 123 121 122 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 121
Write 119
Mixed 101
SusWrite 122
158% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3134 MHz clocked @ 1567 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 30.7
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 27.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $764
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback