ADD TO PC
BUILD

Epson Endeavor Pro4300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Epson Endeavor Pro4300 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Pro4300
Memory	4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '18 at 12:43
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110 18,841 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 44.6 2-Core 91.3 46% 70.4 Pts	4-Core 88.2 8-Core 88.8 12% 88.5 Pts	64-Core 89.6 6% 89.6 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 2340) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 1.03 1% 1.07 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 77 67 80 82 82 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 62.1 Write 14 Mixed 33 SusWrite 74.5 34% 45.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 52%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB 5,813 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 901GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 89 90 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 69.6 Write 29.2 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 89.7 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 60%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$32 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 19GB free Firmware: 3.CHF SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 44 45 45 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 46.7 Write 19.4 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 44.2 27% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 42%
WD WD400BD-22JMC0 40GB 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1GB free Firmware: 07.01D07 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 38.7 Write 41.5 Mixed 29.9 27% 36.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback