Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 142 60% 99.3 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 305 34% 266 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XFX(1682 9380) CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.8.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Lighting 46.1 Reflection 50.7 Parallax 59.3 38% 52 fps	MRender 50.3 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 36.6 34% 42.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G3BMND-3210A 128GB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20100P00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 118 119 119 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 397 Write 193 Mixed 210 SusWrite 116 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 28.4 110% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 93.8 DQ Mixed 32 33% 50.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 83%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 448GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 119 119 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 125 Write 111 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 118 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.2% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16