User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 09:17
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 172
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 453
47% 379 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
Device(1A58 6749) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9907
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 33.1
20% 27 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 23.3
23% 28.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-00000 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT2200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 115 124 125 114 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 486
Write 125
Mixed 147
SusWrite 116
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 23.1
114% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 62.8
96% 187 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback