Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 72% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171114
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '18 at 19:23
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	93%
CPU Throttled	72%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 71.6 1-Core 127 2-Core 250 81% 150 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 834 81% 667 Pts	64-Core 1379 85% 1379 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.7% Very good	Lighting 99 Reflection 113 Parallax 93.6 81% 102 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 91.5 Splatting 97.2 78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 887 831 772 712 687 668 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 1,972 Write 855 Mixed 544 SusWrite 759 227% 1,033 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 34.2 156% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 583 DQ Write 607 DQ Mixed 744 518% 644 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 353%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 39GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 206 42 35 32 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 458 Mixed 333 SusWrite 128 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 48.3 167% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 340 259% 351 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 123%
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 43GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 159 159 159 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 449 Write 154 Mixed 223 SusWrite 159 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 18.8 76% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 56.2 DQ Mixed 92.9 88% 144 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 63%
Mushkin Chronos 90GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 48GB free Firmware: 522ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 96 96 93 95 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 315 Write 121 Mixed 177 SusWrite 95.9 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 27.1 119% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 152 121% 172 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 75%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 35,039 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 133 128 129 128 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 176 Write 145 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 132 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.2 196% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 11,284 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.4% Above average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 14.7 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 10 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 97.8 41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	493x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	55x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $777

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16