Asus M5A97

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111124
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 29 '18 at 15:31
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 124
58% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 2.59
5% 5.35 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 3.74
4% 5.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 27 33 31 37 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 55.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 32.1
27% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 54%
WD WD80 80GB
35GB free
Firmware: 77.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 42 47 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 49
Write 48
Mixed 24
SusWrite 46.1
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 31%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
118GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 50 43 53 54 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 53
Write 53.8
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 51.1
38% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30%
Great: 59%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
3GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 5.7 4.2 2.8 5 1.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 13
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3.8
7% 6.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
21% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 15
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $499
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback