HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory2.1 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 22:37
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 650-$149
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 136
60% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 202
28% 203 Pts
64-Core 206
14% 206 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 304A) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.06 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD2500AVVS-61L2B0 250GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 29 25 23 7.5 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 46.1
Write 42.6
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 20.9
20% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 35%
WDC WD10 EARS-22Y5B1 1TB
94GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 17.4
Mixed 19
SusWrite 20.3
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$6
6GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 9 7.8 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 10.7
21% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.7
179% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback