To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel SandyBridge Platform
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100630
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 22:50
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 149
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 410
40% 327 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 36.6
31% 35 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 35
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 163 133 128 128 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 249
Write 229
Mixed 226
SusWrite 152
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 33.4
105% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 186
140% 186 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
119GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 418 410 415 415 414 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 432
Mixed 313
SusWrite 416
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 32
119% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 150
162% 271 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 110%
Intel X25-M 160GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2CV1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 240
Write 99.8
Mixed 57.9
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 7.5
42% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 54.4
DQ Mixed 62
56% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 46%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
174GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 68.8
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 64.8
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST3000DM001-1CH166 802GB
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 170 168 168 165 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 128
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 167
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback