User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemRazer Razer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 23:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 452
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Device(1B61 2007) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 15
Parallax 19.6
14% 17.1 fps
MRender 17.1
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 14.4
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DM80105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 350 350 307 354 353 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 427
Write 331
Mixed 240
SusWrite 345
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 180
158% 237 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback