User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
11 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemRazer Razer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 23:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 172
63% 133 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 446
48% 371 Pts
64-Core 452
30% 452 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Device(1B61 2007) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 39
Parallax 62.7
14% 50.5 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 33.2
15% 43.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DM80105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 350 350 307 354 353 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 427
Write 331
Mixed 240
SusWrite 345
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 180
158% 237 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback