Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '18 at 02:58
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 192 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 632 57% 482 Pts	64-Core 640 40% 640 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) 44,235 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 28.9 18% 22.9 fps	MRender 11.4 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 22.2 16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 418 437 443 425 415 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 444 Mixed 293 SusWrite 428 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 39.8 144% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 284 235% 336 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 119%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 239GB 477 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 63GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 134 136 140 140 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 414 Write 296 Mixed 272 SusWrite 144 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 20.4 100% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 30.9 72% 146 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 94%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 930GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 188 184 190 190 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 185 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 186 108% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 110%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 245GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 119 119 114 115 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 86.8 Write 111 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 117 68% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 75%
Verbatim STORE N GO 32GB 3,394 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 29GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.97% Terrible	Read 9 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.3 SusWrite 3.2 3% 3.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.97% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234 3,507 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 24.1 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 18.6 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)