Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6CAYB
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '18 at 08:52
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 88.2
36% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 134
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2067) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 2.12
2% 2.46 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 6.04
4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 183 61 57 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 442
Write 297
Mixed 322
SusWrite 111
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 20.1
91% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 165
127% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 94%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
23GB free, PID 6200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 14 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 18.6
Write 14.8
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 13.7
21% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.6
192% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback