Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 00:07
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 274
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 784
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 785
49% 785 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 79.7
Parallax 68.9
66% 76.3 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 75.7
61% 73.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 172 9.7 48 19 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 503
Write 228
Mixed 331
SusWrite 80.1
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 1.1
31% 9.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 35.9
51% 96.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
119GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 98 98 97 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 154
Write 118
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 97.5
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
2TB free
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 140 138 141 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 120
Write 117
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 140
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 83%
ASMT 2105 3TB
79GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 170
Write 130
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 114
161% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 71%
asmedia ASMT1153e 3TB
696GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 72 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 70.2
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 72.5
99% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 KHX2400C15D4/4G Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 26.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback