bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel NUC5i5RYB
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '16 at 17:46
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5250U 4,386 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 84.1 44% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 135 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile) 5,021 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Intel(8086 2057) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4454 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	7.36% Terrible	Lighting 8.37 Reflection 8.85 Parallax 10.5 7% 9.24 fps	MRender 7.71 Gravity 8.33 Splatting 13.3 8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.36% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258 1,264 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 7 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6898 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 449 (AB) Unknown 100 100 1 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 39 (AE) Unknown 100 100 38 (B4) Unknown 0 0 5510 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 50 43 244814315570 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 1 (D2) Unknown 100 100 8 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9305258890 (F7) Unknown 100 100 291183988 (F8) Unknown 100 100 488739741	81.5% Excellent	Read 508 Write 386 Mixed 402 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 26.8 108% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 14.9 36% 76 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 19 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13.9 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,019x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,564x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	930x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,039x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16