PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus CG5290 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090511 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Nov 26 '18 at 08:34 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.1
|
||||
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
193GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 37 36 36 30 36 MB/s
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
78GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 37 36 36 32 35 MB/s
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
31GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 63 66 66 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
562GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 113 110 116 116 MB/s
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 32x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 5x |
Core i7 975Intel $550Bench 72%, 3,143 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 6x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 5x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $377 |