Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 65% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 22:25
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 57.7
34% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 67
8-Core 68
9% 67.5 Pts
64-Core 74.8
5% 74.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 2.66
3% 3.89 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 7.35
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 0.9 2.7 4.5 4.3 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 55%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
17GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.1 6.5 7.5 8 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Read 14
Write 5
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 7
11% 8.88 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
23% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback