Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory	5 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110720
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '18 at 01:41
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 82.4 44% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 75.2 8-Core 82 10% 78.6 Pts	64-Core 81 5% 81 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% XFX(1682 7250) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.11.1 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	7.93% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 13.7 8% 11.5 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 9.43 7% 8.94 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.93% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 81GB free Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 229 229 243 243 247 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.3% Good	Read 256 Write 243 Mixed 171 SusWrite 238 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 27.5 101% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 115 107% 165 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 91%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.05G11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 67 61 68 65 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 37.3 Write 56.7 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 64.3 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 61%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 145GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 2375 Mixed 0.2 781% 1,188 MB/s	4K Read 285 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1,056% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 44GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	227x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	49x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	37x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	231x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	62x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	32x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	9x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	8x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 44GBUnknownBench 21%, 16 samples	6x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16