Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '18 at 16:18
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 76 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 185 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 650 60% 499 Pts	64-Core 818 51% 818 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89% Excellent	Lighting 115 Reflection 126 Parallax 119 94% 120 fps	MRender 94.7 Gravity 109 Splatting 89.4 79% 97.6 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 47 46 58 53 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 272 Write 57.2 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 49.6 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 13.5 60% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 7.6 DQ Mixed 40.7 35% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 53%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 437GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 421 442 434 437 335 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 431 Mixed 419 SusWrite 414 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 52.1 178% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 353 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 306GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 140 132 138 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 164 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 139 94% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$207 4,097 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	35.9% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 11.1 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 88.3 45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $154Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $941

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16