Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170505
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '18 at 18:31
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 67.5 1-Core 115 2-Core 228 74% 137 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 707 69% 565 Pts	64-Core 825 51% 825 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.1 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 171 Reflection 189 Parallax 187 139% 182 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 171 Splatting 121 111% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 603 592 576 565 557 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 2,025 Write 1,610 Mixed 627 SusWrite 626 271% 1,222 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 54.6 188% 67.8 MB/s	DQ Read 917 DQ Write 748 DQ Mixed 727 573% 798 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 254%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 235GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 375 381 381 370 369 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 418 Write 453 Mixed 308 SusWrite 381 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 40.7 145% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 178 155% 223 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 107%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 119GB free Firmware: 0002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 140 139 139 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 325 Write 137 Mixed 176 SusWrite 139 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 13.5 102% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 89.2 91% 151 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 62%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 194 195 196 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 204 Mixed 95.8 SusWrite 195 125% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 503GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 99.5 Write 95.2 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 61.1 59% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.4% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 25.5 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 20.6 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)