Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 660 5,902 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 169 62% 109 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 214 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84F2) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 3.81 3% 3.88 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 5.13 4% 4.24 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB 3,337 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.04V03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 98 106 108 109 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 100 Write 99.7 Mixed 71 SusWrite 105 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.3 232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown OCZ3G1600LV2G 4x2GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 12.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core i5 660IntelBench 49%, 5,902 samples	1x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5458-001.A00LF 8GBHynixBench 25%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16