Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '18 at 02:23
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 170 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 632 56% 475 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.7% Good	Lighting 84.2 Reflection 103 Parallax 102 69% 96.2 fps	MRender 86.3 Gravity 92.8 Splatting 84.8 72% 88 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 802GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 450 451 448 449 448 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 442 Mixed 375 SusWrite 450 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 43.1 140% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 40.3 90% 185 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 285GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 452 452 449 436 365 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 447 Mixed 354 SusWrite 434 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 45.3 146% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 45.9 95% 194 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB 42,084 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.8% Good	MC Read 28 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 19.3 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 15.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	82x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	27x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	24x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	12x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GBBench 112%, 7,301 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	5x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GBKingstonBench 87%, 2,431 samples	9x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $624

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16