Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H57D-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '18 at 19:51
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 73.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 185 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 229 33% 243 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.9% Average	Lighting 61.4 Reflection 66 Parallax 58.9 50% 62.1 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 56 50% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 90GB-$96 764 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.3. SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 68 60 70 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 350 Write 88 Mixed 144 SusWrite 67.1 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 32.9 120% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 93.8 DQ Mixed 118 93% 131 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 78%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 52GB free Firmware: MAT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 103 107 84 39 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 316 Write 166 Mixed 194 SusWrite 76.2 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 44.4 145% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 135 101% 136 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 138GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 130 82 80 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 182 Write 170 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 105 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 15.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 10.2 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 94 43% 94 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	37x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	32x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	30x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GBSeagateBench 117%, 6,074 samples	8x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	49x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16