Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS/BR (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160923
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 01:40
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 200 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 385 51% 380 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6251) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 31 Parallax 37.7 32% 35.9 fps	MRender 39.8 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 35.9 31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3F Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 443 Write 323 Mixed 185 70% 317 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 7 70% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 45.6 DQ Mixed 44.7 46% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB 10,780 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 88GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 112 112 113 114 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 113 Write 77 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 108 68% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 114%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB 11,393 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 84GB free Firmware: FH10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 73 73 73 73 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 30 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 71.2 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avant W641GU48J5213ND 1x8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.3 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	251x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	99x
Core i3-7100Intel $56Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	131x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	19x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x
9905678-102.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 1,046 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16