Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B55 3,005 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 47.1 2-Core 93.7 50% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 182 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M360 1,374 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Gigabyte(1458 22CA) 2GB CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	8.47% Terrible	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 14.1 9% 12.6 fps	MRender 6.86 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 10.8 8% 9.41 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.47% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 179 150 175 259 245 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 353 Write 185 Mixed 204 SusWrite 205 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 22.4 90% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 59.7 DQ Mixed 104 84% 124 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 6,893 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.3% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 12.8 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 7,510 samples	2x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,248 samples	1x
RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 2,171 samples	1x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $229

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16