Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade Stealth (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '18 at 13:02
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	6%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 204 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 306 41% 306 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Lighting 26.8 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 33.8 22% 30.5 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 26.6 Splatting 31.2 24% 28.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 255GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 578 544 544 531 532 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,204 Write 1,045 Mixed 697 SusWrite 583 197% 882 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 78.9 255% 92.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,165 DQ Write 996 DQ Mixed 1,048 794% 1,070 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 259%
Seagate Ultra Slim PL 2TB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 644GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 76 85 94 91 91 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 78.3 Write 81.5 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 83 60% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT52L1G32D4PG-107 2x8GB 2,777 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	64.5% Good	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 21.2 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 20.4 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	328x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	162x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	106x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	199x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	157x
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	90x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	84x
CA3-8D256 256GBLiteonBench 148%, 3,184 samples	49x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	48x

RAM
K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 14,699 samples	382x
MT52L1G32D4PG-107 2x8GBSamsungBench 58%, 468 samples	65x
K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 5,177 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16