Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion x360 Convertible (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8074
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150731
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '18 at 00:13
Run Duration	385 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.53% Terrible	Memory 13.6 1-Core 17.1 2-Core 30.6 12% 20.4 Pts	4-Core 31.7 8-Core 34.5 4% 33.1 Pts	64-Core 30.2 2% 30.2 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.53% Great: 27%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 50 41 104 120 127 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.8% Below average	Read 277 Write 168 Mixed 148 SusWrite 118 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 9.2 40% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 61.9 DQ Write 42.4 DQ Mixed 20.1 24% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN 1x4GB 4,009 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.72% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 372 11% 372 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.72% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	386x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	332x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	30x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	31x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	90x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	47x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	31x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16