Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 22:25
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 414
50% 386 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 38.9
34% 41.5 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 35
31% 38 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 162 33 101 172 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 102
Write 101
SusWrite 127
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 41.9
156% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 79.1
129% 247 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$231
7TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 190 188 181 186 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 184
Mixed 91
SusWrite 186
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
314% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$231
7TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 177 160 179 183 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 188
Mixed 101
SusWrite 180
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
311% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
840GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 72.3
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 99.7
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 66%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
104GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 85 86 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 89
Write 82
Mixed 69
SusWrite 78.5
107% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 4.7
321% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
15GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 13 12 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.68% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 7.3
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 12.6
15% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.68%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback