Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180103
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '18 at 23:55
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR) 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 34% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Memory 74 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 113 53% 85.8 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 111 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200 6,989 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B A004) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 1.97 0% 1.46 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 2 2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74 4,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3GB free Firmware: N0815B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 447 Write 153 Mixed 200 58% 267 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 14.5 4K Mixed 24.7 73% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 32.5 69% 144 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 83%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 60 58 64 78 84 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 85.9 Write 86.3 Mixed 44.8 SusWrite 68.8 52% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 69%
Innostor Innostor 32GB 1,196 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 28GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	9.44% Terrible	Read 37 Write 16.8 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 16.4 25% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 32% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.44% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FE 1x4GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.3% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 9.8 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	67x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	64x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16