Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170509
Uptime	23 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '18 at 18:20
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 136 57% 95.2 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 507 45% 380 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6393) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 184 Parallax 168 121% 167 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 175 Splatting 120 112% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 436 423 422 416 404 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,624 Write 1,701 Mixed 581 SusWrite 474 244% 1,095 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 94.1 4K Mixed 47.1 161% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 894 DQ Write 722 DQ Mixed 722 564% 779 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 254%
SanDisk SSD 256GB-$150 2,567 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 108GB free Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 309 331 318 288 265 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 415 Write 310 Mixed 103 SusWrite 304 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 8.7 41% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 34.9 DQ Write 9.1 DQ Mixed 11.1 11% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 54%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 536GB free Firmware: 01.01L01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 121 123 123 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 129 Write 134 Mixed 99 SusWrite 123 90% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 27.6 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 22.6 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $860

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16