Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 12:50
Run Duration	330 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 139 2-Core 273 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 771 73% 604 Pts	64-Core 766 47% 766 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1435) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 121 Parallax 103 97% 114 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 107 Splatting 107 86% 105 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 502 Write 206 Mixed 325 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 57 186% 66.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 324 243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 44GB free Firmware: M0CR011 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 422 Write 469 Mixed 384 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 41.1 150% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 339 253% 337 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 104%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 131 Write 130 Mixed 92.3 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 4,943 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 600GB free Firmware: 1402 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9 8.9 8.9 8.9 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 39 Write 30.5 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 9 21% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 64%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 776GB free Firmware: 1306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9 8.9 9 8.9 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 34.8 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 9 21% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 625GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9 9 9 8.9 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 35.8 Mixed 34 SusWrite 9 22% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 66%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 35GB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5990 Write 32.7 Mixed 76.2 1,372% 2,033 MB/s	4K Read 872 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 5.3 3,490% 293 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 79%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 113GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 80 Write 123 Mixed 57.2 114% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 60%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2.5TB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,255 Write 38.3 Mixed 95.5 1,444% 2,130 MB/s	4K Read 876 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 5.3 3,485% 294 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 79%
Seagate D3 Station 5TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 235GB free, PID 6126 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 109 Write 108 Mixed 36 102% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.7 173% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 76%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.8 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 34 Write 33.5 Mixed 26 SusWrite 7.9 33% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 59%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 19GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 35 Write 35.5 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 8.1 37% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 52%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 172 172 172 171 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 114 Write 119 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 170 163% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 1 277% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$96 4,081 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.3% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 20.5 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 23 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	997x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	252x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,154

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16