Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '19 at 12:39
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$142
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
SC Int 107
SC Float 120
SC Mixed 113
90% 113 Pts
QC Int 393
QC Float 436
QC Mixed 399
93% 409 Pts
MC Int 926
MC Float 970
MC Mixed 971
143% 956 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
44.3% Average
Lighting 119
Reflection 119
Parallax 119
37% 119 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 119
Splatting 119
50% 119 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 145%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$103
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 286 214 188 187 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 485
Mixed 385
SusWrite 252
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59
196% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 316
250% 348 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 113%
Great: 135%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$96
114GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 75 62 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 72.5
67% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$107
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 37.2
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 30.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 5,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $1,134
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $248Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $709Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $606SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback