MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B78
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181106
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '19 at 18:20
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	43%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 176 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 512 53% 426 Pts	64-Core 778 48% 778 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.5 Reflection 14.9 Parallax 25.3 17% 20.3 fps	MRender 20.3 Gravity 20.3 Splatting 19.3 16% 20 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB 5,978 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0327B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 68 2.5 11 118 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 412 Write 331 Mixed 323 SusWrite 108 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 17.2 82% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 31.2 81% 164 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 119 117 125 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 136 Write 129 Mixed 78.2 SusWrite 120 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C15 2x8GB 6,535 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.1% Very good	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 28.1 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 20.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 97 41% 97 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	489x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $199Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	105x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	94x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	79x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	63x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	55x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $56Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	56x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	54x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $546

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16