Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '19 at 07:12
Run Duration	296 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 97.5 1-Core 153 2-Core 306 102% 185 Pts	4-Core 602 8-Core 607 81% 604 Pts	64-Core 610 38% 610 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.7% Above average	Lighting 70 Reflection 62.7 Parallax 59.2 57% 64 fps	MRender 61.3 Gravity 65.1 Splatting 66.7 53% 64.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40 8,737 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 691 728 777 759 167 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 576 Write 680 Mixed 605 SusWrite 530 135% 598 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 49.7 196% 77.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 393 DQ Mixed 294 246% 355 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 153%
Intel MEMPEK1W016GA 14GB 866 User benchmarks, average bench 207% 13GB free Firmware: K3110310 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 142 141 140 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	249% Outstanding	Read 754 Write 140 Mixed 232 SusWrite 141 69% 317 MB/s	4K Read 257 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 143 627% 167 MB/s	DQ Read 871 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 246 248% 421 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 249% Great: 245%
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65 11,104 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 238GB free Firmware: HP01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 552 323 126 109 108 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 910 Write 541 Mixed 587 SusWrite 219 125% 565 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 50.1 212% 86.8 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 516 DQ Mixed 325 267% 373 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 233GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 305 304 303 302 301 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 453 Mixed 388 SusWrite 317 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 65.7 196% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 356 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 233GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 253 254 253 253 252 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 328 Mixed 329 SusWrite 274 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 56.1 197% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 229 208% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 118%
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65 11,104 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 238GB free Firmware: HP01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 555 321 108 126 109 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 804 Write 539 Mixed 547 SusWrite 216 117% 526 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 50.3 209% 88.2 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 522 DQ Mixed 319 266% 374 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AR32C16S8K2SU416R 2x8GB 3,827 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 41.8 MC Write 48.2 MC Mixed 32.5 117% 40.8 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 46.9 SC Mixed 35.3 101% 35.3 GB/s	Latency 48.3 83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 108%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	84x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	13x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	41x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	20x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	9x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	6x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	6x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	5x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 2,149 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 82%, 3,198 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 96%, 2,357 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $854

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16