Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 14:40
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2970WX
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 54.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
75% 144 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 765
74% 607 Pts
64-Core 3,507
217% 3,507 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 140
Parallax 126
101% 130 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 118
Splatting 106
91% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0803B5a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 448
Mixed 403
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 41.4
132% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 74.2
94% 172 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/16G KHX2400C14D4/16G KHX2400C14D4/16G KHX2400C14D4/16G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.1% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 24.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 17.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback