Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 17:49
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 172
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 737
72% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,105
68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2781 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 51
44% 56.1 fps
MRender 77.8
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 71
56% 67.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,732
Write 35
Mixed 68.8
335% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 462
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.9
706% 156 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Amd-raid Array 1 255GB
238GB free
Firmware: 9.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 423
Write 368
Mixed 178
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 21.3
76% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 98.5
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 70
72% 116 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 199%
Amd-raid Array 3 358GB
51GB free
Firmware: 9.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 357
Mixed 372
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 28.3
118% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 142
136% 204 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 128%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB
893GB free
Firmware: 9.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,719
Write 55
Mixed 85.2
1,160% 1,620 MB/s
4K Read 440
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
18,499% 147 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 106%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
0GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.3
Write 6.2
Mixed 8.5
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.9% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback