Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3 (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101117
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '19 at 16:32
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 107 52% 80.7 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 286 30% 240 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6970 9,594 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 03BC) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 27.9 Reflection 20.4 Parallax 22.7 23% 23.7 fps	MRender 20.2 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 27.4 20% 23.7 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 59 55 68 67 56 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 148 Write 111 Mixed 155 SusWrite 62 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 29.7 109% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 34.1 35% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 75%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 282 Write 262 Mixed 243 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 36 116% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 36.1 DQ Write 67.3 DQ Mixed 46 37% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1.5TB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.27% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 27.3 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 15.4 30% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.27% Great: 23%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 17GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2 1.9 2 1.9 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.97% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 23 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 2.5 22% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 21%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 32GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 14 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 23.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 14.8 29% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB 1,256 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM 533 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.4 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.4 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89TD PRO USB3 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	12x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	9x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	8x

GPU
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	4x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	3x
HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	2x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GBUnknownBench 34%, 166 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16