Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180207
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 18:22
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 81.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 743
73% 599 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 145
Parallax 126
115% 137 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 137
Splatting 108
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 461 410 411 406 381 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 403
Write 481
Mixed 334
SusWrite 423
93% 410 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 41.1
156% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 315
241% 327 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$27
65GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 60 60 60 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 59.5
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 59.2
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33%
Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59
10GB free
Firmware: GM3OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 59 58 62 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 61.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 61.6
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 46%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
53GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 92 89 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 92.6
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.1 4.8 3.1 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Read 26.8
Write 1.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4
8% 9.22 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 3
134% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 18%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1GB
0GB free, PID b4b5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 6
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 6.2
9% 6.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
12% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 34
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 26.9
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,046
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback