Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, , 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '16 at 06:15
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 121 52% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 436 43% 351 Pts	64-Core 993 61% 993 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.52% Terrible	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 18.4 13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.52% Great: 13%
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	21.1% Poor	Lighting 26 Reflection 24 Parallax 31 21% 27 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 21.6 21% 26 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 364GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1894 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 833 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 20 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11101090483	70.5% Very good	Read 498 Write 323 Mixed 354 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 20.9 80% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 98.6 DQ Mixed 51.6 64% 115 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 126%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 252GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 133 4008 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 353 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1746 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 69 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 36 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1386 (C2) HDA temperature 114 94 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	70% Good	Read 119 Write 125 Mixed 116 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.23 77% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 87%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 143GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 136 130 4200 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 405 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 508 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 289 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 104 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2443 (C2) HDA temperature 114 96 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	45.4% Average	Read 81.5 Write 76.7 Mixed 78.7 60% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 0.26 4K Mixed 0.17 55% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-116.A00 8x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	MC Read 43.9 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 35.2 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16