Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 21 '19 at 16:48
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 684
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.6% Very good
Lighting 118
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 59.8
96% 91.4 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 33
21% 24.9 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 326 315 279 327 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 382
Write 323
Mixed 274
SusWrite 316
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 30.8
112% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 324
251% 345 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$46
118GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 358 346 274 278 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 305
Write 312
Mixed 254
SusWrite 316
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 29
106% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 128%
Intel MEMPEK1W016GA 14GB
13GB free
Firmware: K3110300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 67 68 62 50 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 543
Write 113
Mixed 180
SusWrite 62.8
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 107
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 68
274% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 865
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 137
187% 364 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 130%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback