Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B45
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B45) (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '19 at 20:01
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139 23,493 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 232 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 443 50% 392 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% PNY(196E 1304) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 168 Parallax 164 137% 167 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 146 Splatting 106 113% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 208 145 144 143 141 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 461 Write 375 Mixed 267 SusWrite 181 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 34.2 125% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 245 185% 247 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 95%
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GB 7,448 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 60GB free Firmware: FXT2301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 130 130 130 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 464 Write 128 Mixed 159 SusWrite 129 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 22.8 88% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 41.1 DQ Mixed 56.8 54% 88.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 56%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 369GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 97 97 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 84.7 Write 106 Mixed 54 SusWrite 95.3 62% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.4 234% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.1% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 19.9 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 16.6 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	98x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	84x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	75x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	120x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	87x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	78x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,094

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16