Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B10
Motherboard	MSI MEG Z390 GODLIKE (MS-7B10) (all builds)
Memory	45.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181114
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '19 at 19:12
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 89.4 1-Core 164 2-Core 303 101% 186 Pts	4-Core 654 8-Core 1,192 111% 923 Pts	64-Core 1,750 108% 1,750 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000 8,562 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 391.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.2% Above average	Lighting 45.9 Reflection 122 Parallax 115 37% 94.2 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 126 Splatting 101 90% 110 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 541 538 525 525 522 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 740 Write 640 Mixed 659 SusWrite 531 144% 642 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 70.3 235% 82.2 MB/s	DQ Read 53.4 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 1,003 504% 397 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 371%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 90 89 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 485 Mixed 464 SusWrite 88.2 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 58.5 193% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 341 257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 3TB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 95 96 95 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 482 Mixed 455 SusWrite 94.6 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 58.4 193% 66.7 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 341 257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4K3600C18 4x16GB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 21.8 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 23.6 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 136%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	91x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	80x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	48x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	30x
CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 18,655 samples	27x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	23x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,654

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16