| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 55% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Asus X202E (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK X202E |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130620 |
| Uptime | 44.7 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 02 '19 at 19:27 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
| CPU Throttled | 55% |
PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
|
30.2%
Below average
|
25% 31.6 Pts
|
6% 43 Pts
|
3% 44.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 108D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
1.47%
Terrible
|
1% 1.31 fps
|
2% 2.64 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 76 76 45 83 68 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
33% 147 MB/s
|
64% 21 MB/s
|
70% 91.2 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G4E1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
17% 5.9 GB/s
|
3% 0.93 GB/s
|
27% 147 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X202E Builds (Compare 157 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus X202E
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples | 125x |
| Core i3-2365MIntelBench 41%, 2,016 samples | 30x |
| Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 127x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |