DEPO X9DR3-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemDEPO X9DR3-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DR3-F
Memory38 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 695
61% 518 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 285GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 125 127 125 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 112
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 126
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.3
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 89%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 120 116 120 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 167
Write 122
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 118
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Kingston 9965426-096.A M393B1K70DH0- Kingston 9965426-059.A Kingston 9965426-059.A Kingston 9965426-096.A Kingston 9965426-096.A Kingston 9965426-059.A0 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback