Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '19 at 02:33
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 76.5 1-Core 132 2-Core 254 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 794 76% 627 Pts	64-Core 1,037 64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Lighting 71.7 Reflection 75.3 Parallax 65.3 58% 70.8 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 68.6 Splatting 69.9 57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 838GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1747 1841 1254 1125 1118 1075 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	277% Outstanding	Read 2,135 Write 1,672 Mixed 1,307 SusWrite 1360 362% 1,618 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 63.8 216% 74.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,050 DQ Write 835 DQ Mixed 980 724% 955 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 277% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial UDIMM DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB-$29 2,562 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 10.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	266x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	190x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	113x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	85x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	48x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	39x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	36x
CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 23,313 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16