Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 07:19
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 209
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 649
63% 517 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.1% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 104
Parallax 97.2
79% 99.3 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 92.5
74% 90.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 295 301 300 303 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 307
Mixed 258
SusWrite 300
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 33.8
139% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 216
196% 301 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
881GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 181 182 185 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 178
Mixed 100
SusWrite 182
119% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
903GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 106 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68% Good
Read 130
Write 120
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 106
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68%
Great: 84%
WDC WD32 00BPVT-80ZEST0 320GB
138GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 35 35 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 35
Write 33
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 34
43% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3E1 CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH3 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.3% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 27.4
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 19.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback