| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | HP Z840 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2129 |
| Memory | 60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150423 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 08 '19 at 13:14 |
| Run Duration | 237 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
57.8%
Above average
|
52% 89.8 Pts
|
48% 408 Pts
|
67% 1,080 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.89
|
45.8%
Average
|
47% 61.4 fps
|
44% 55.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 450 380 401 396 368 MB/s
|
93.7%
Outstanding
|
70% 317 MB/s
|
128% 46 MB/s
|
173% 234 MB/s
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 8.2 46 51 51 51 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
83.9%
Excellent
|
96% 33.5 GB/s
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
35% 114 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,948 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z840 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 132x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 117x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 99x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 150x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 103x |
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 94x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $95 |