Samsung 700Z7C

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung 700Z7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130227
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '19 at 22:29
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3615QM 2,657 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 69 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 65.1 38% 55.8 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 168 18% 141 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0CC) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 3.03 4% 4.69 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.3 5% 5.54 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 5GB free Firmware: SSD 9.14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 27 26 27 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 127 Write 21.3 Mixed 12 SusWrite 25.9 10% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 6.7 28% 7.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 15%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 33 46 58 53 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	30% Poor	Read 53.6 Write 101 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 49.3 44% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.4 171% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.6 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.9 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700Z7C Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z7C

CPU
Core i7-3615QMIntelBench 62%, 2,657 samples	30x
Core i7-3635QMIntelBench 62%, 2,986 samples	22x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	40x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	12x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
Blue 500GBWD $94Bench 86%, 19,345 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GBSamsungBench 53%, 96 samples	14x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 740 samples	11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 289 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16