Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '19 at 14:15
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 232
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 718
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
MSI(1462 8094) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 1%
AMD R9 390X-$340
Asus(1043 04DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 90.2
60% 76.4 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 67
Splatting 80.3
59% 70.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,060
Write 723
Mixed 636
247% 1,139 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 62.1
253% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 430
379% 587 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
249GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 802 804 798 687 798 799 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,014
Write 907
Mixed 547
SusWrite 781
182% 812 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60.1
207% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 633
DQ Mixed 452
369% 518 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 177%
Great: 445%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
731GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 110 111 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 137
Write 116
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 109
70% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 75%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
730GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 102 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 98.7
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 100
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 88%
NORELSYS 1081 64GB
36GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 97 80 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 160
Write 58
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 92.7
95% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.9
185% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 40.7
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 23.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 110%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback