Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170515
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '19 at 11:22
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 70.5 1-Core 103 2-Core 183 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 528 52% 426 Pts	64-Core 533 33% 533 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 9580) ≥ 4GB; rx-580p8d CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 68.5 Reflection 72.2 Parallax 86.5 56% 75.7 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 57.8 53% 66.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 347GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 429 323 242 244 244 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 445 Write 454 Mixed 381 SusWrite 310 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 38.1 131% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 288 215% 286 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 98%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 358GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 442 473 484 485 479 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 414 Mixed 381 SusWrite 458 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 53 173% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 364 274% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 30GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 308 307 309 309 309 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 476 Mixed 407 SusWrite 317 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 52.3 163% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 358 270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 38GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 57 56 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 54 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 55.7 41% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 67%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 596GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 89 91 91 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 83.3 Write 81.2 Mixed 53 SusWrite 89.2 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB-$70 6,515 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 25.7 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 20 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)