Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 GAMING SLI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180829
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '19 at 19:32
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 96.8 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 597 8-Core 1,090 101% 843 Pts	64-Core 1,158 72% 1,158 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 76 121 139 141 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 451 Write 195 Mixed 117 SusWrite 112 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 12.5 49% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 55%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 14GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 500 Write 479 Mixed 410 103% 463 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 56.7 198% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 236 210% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 10GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 92 93 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 83.7 Write 51.7 Mixed 71 SusWrite 94.5 56% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 25GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 68 67 69 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 68 Write 63.7 Mixed 55 SusWrite 67.7 47% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4000 C19 Series 2x8GB 4,474 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3866 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 43.6 MC Write 44.7 MC Mixed 31.1 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 34.4 SC Mixed 29.5 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 51.1 78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	367x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	316x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	230x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	106x
RTX 2080Nvidia $394Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	91x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	78x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	70x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	53x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	54x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $592

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16