Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120208
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '19 at 03:23
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 82.9 2-Core 153 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 441 43% 352 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Lighting 67.2 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 60.2 55% 64.4 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 64.6 Splatting 64.5 54% 66 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 166 173 171 173 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.2% Average	Read 271 Write 186 Mixed 194 SusWrite 171 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 23.7 83% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 34 DQ Write 61.6 DQ Mixed 42.3 34% 46 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 458GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 85.5 Write 86 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 67.1 56% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4.5TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 135 136 136 134 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 92.4 Write 120 Mixed 55 SusWrite 134 140% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.6 201% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 75%
WD My Passport 083A 2TB 995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 694GB free, PID 083a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 73 75 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 69.5 Write 71 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 74.2 79% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 3,744 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	44.1% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	187x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	20x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16